IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i6p587-596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biocultural belief and iodine prophylaxis

Author

Listed:
  • Lellep Fernandez, Renate

Abstract

Iodine prophylaxis, the most cost-effective public health intervention as yet known, has been slow to be adopted even where goiter and cretinism--the most common expression of iodine deficiency disorders (IDD)--have long been known to be endemic and where underdevelopment cannot explain the absence of prophylaxis. Belief in the hereditary causation of IDD tends to be high in societies where familial goiter is common and endogamy is high. This belief props up opposition to prophylaxis, making dietary intervention appear both useless and wasteful. The examination of genealogies (pedigrees) alongside dietary history can erode support for hereditary causation. This can be done by charting the incidence of IDD against social and dietary changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lellep Fernandez, Renate, 1988. "Biocultural belief and iodine prophylaxis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 587-596, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:6:p:587-596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90006-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:6:p:587-596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.