IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i3p217-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confrontation and politeness strategies in physician-patient interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Robins, Lynne S.
  • Wolf, Fredric M.

Abstract

The therapeutic sucess of physician-patient interactions depends in large part on how physicians interpret and respond to patients' implicit and explicit messages. Using a hypothetical vignette, in which a patient refuses to comply with a recommended therapeutic regimen, we found that first-year medical students with no classroom training in medical interviewing implicity recognized that the situation called for face preserving or polite linguistic behavior. Ninety percent of them used culturally sanctioned politeness forms to repair the conversational breakdown depicted in the vignette. They responded to this clinical scenario, however, with linguistic behaviors borrowed from their everyday interactions, some of which were culturally appropriate, but not necessarily therapeutic. We suggest that students can learn to adapt their culturally appropriate behaviors and engage in therapeutic communication as physicians if they are given the necessary conceptual tools. We discuss how Brown and Levinson's theories of politeness and strategic language usage can (1) provide a framework for interpreting communication in general and physician-patient interaction in particular, (2) illuminate some of the problems inherent in doctor-patient encounters, and (3) be used prescriptively for teaching students and health professionals how to avoid some communication difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Robins, Lynne S. & Wolf, Fredric M., 1988. "Confrontation and politeness strategies in physician-patient interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 217-221, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:3:p:217-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90124-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:3:p:217-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.