IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i2p167-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of prenatal care utilization

Author

Listed:
  • McDonald, Thomas P.
  • Coburn, Andrew F.

Abstract

Despite substantial evidence linking improved pregnancy outcomes with receipt of prenatal care and recent improvements in prenatal care utilization, specific subpopulations continue to receive inadequate or less than adequate care. The study reported here examined the predictive power of a set of variables describing the type of financial coverage available to the mother, attributes of the mother, father and family and characteristics of the health care system. A stratified random sample of mothers was generated from state birth certificate files and surveyed through the use of a mailed questionnaire. Stratification was designed to assure adequate representation of subgroups expected to receive less adequate prenatal care. The study findings indicate that there were deficiencies in prenatal care utilization and that these deficiencies were concentrated in specific areas and subpopulations within the state. While the majority of women in the study started prenatal care in the recommended first trimester, most did not maintain the recommended schedule of visits with their care provider. The following conditions were found to reduce the likelihood of receiving adequate care after controling for service need: younger women (particularly adolescents); less educated (particularly those without a high school education); low income; longer travel time; Medicaid recipient; and rural resident. In addition, it was found that where one lives is a significant predictor of the adequacy of prenatal care even after controling for all of the above variables. The authors conclude that it is important in assessing potential policy and program options for reducing differentials in prenatal care use to distinguish between economic and noneconomic barriers to utilization. Receipt of Medicaid does not assure adequate prenatal care use. Assuring continuity in care may be more difficult to achieve than initiating care in the first trimester. The fact that dramatic variations exist in prenatal care utilization raises additional concerns that the content and quality of this care may also be a problem for some groups.

Suggested Citation

  • McDonald, Thomas P. & Coburn, Andrew F., 1988. "Predictors of prenatal care utilization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 167-172, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:2:p:167-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90325-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geoffrey Warner, 1997. "Racial differences in the hurdling of prenatal care barriers," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 25(3), pages 95-114, March.
    2. Sumedha Arya & Pamela Wilton & David Page & Laurence Boma-Fischer & Georgina Floros & Katie N Dainty & Rochelle Winikoff & Michelle Sholzberg, 2020. "Healthcare provider perspectives on inequities in access to care for patients with inherited bleeding disorders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Yunwei Gai & Li Feng, 2012. "Effects of Federal Nutrition Program on Birth Outcomes," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 40(1), pages 61-83, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:2:p:167-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.