IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v27y1988i10p1061-1070.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of legal and policy issues in legislating compensation for victims of toxic substance pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Soble, Stephen M
  • Brennan, Janis H

Abstract

Despite the actual and potential effects of toxic substance pollution upon human health, the United States Congress has never enacted a comprehensive victim compensation system. The approach of the Congress, to date, has been limited by a concern about legislating on a topic fraught with scientific uncertainty--the actual causation of injury or death by toxic substance pollution Individuals who believe they have been injured by toxic substances often bring their claims in state courts, where they face the difficult task of proving causation. Industry is principally concerned with the high cost of a compensation system, not the public health issue of scientific causation. From a policy standpoint, legislation is needed that produces information and standards on causation which assist both victims and industry. Congress has the opportunity to craft legislation that will deal rationally with an epic problem. To do so, however, the Congress must recognize scientific uncertainty as an omnipresent element of causation in cases of toxic substance pollution. This starting point, a comprehensive system of compensating victims of toxic substance pollution, can be drafted to address the values of data collection, data interpretation, prevention, conservation of economic resources, and fairness.

Suggested Citation

  • Soble, Stephen M & Brennan, Janis H, 1988. "A review of legal and policy issues in legislating compensation for victims of toxic substance pollution," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 1061-1070, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:10:p:1061-1070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90301-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:27:y:1988:i:10:p:1061-1070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.