IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i4p443-450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-evaluations of factors promoting and disturbing sleep: An epidemiological survey in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Urponen, Helka
  • Vuori, Ilkka
  • Hasan, Joel
  • Partinen, Markku

Abstract

The purpose of this epidemiological survey (N = 1600) was to describe the factors which middle-aged urban people in Finland perceived as promoting or disturbing sleep. The response rate was 75%. The results suggested that quality of sleep is determined by numerous factors; social and psychological factors, health status, external sleeping conditions, life style and living habits. Every third respondent felt that exercise had a positive impact on sleep. Second in importance were reading and listening to music. Furthermore, sauna, shower and bath, stability in life, psychological factors, positive experience in work, satisfactory sexual life and good and quiet sleeping environment were reported to have positive effects on sleep. Men considered work-related pressure and fatigue (20%) as the most important factor disturbing falling asleep or quality of sleep. In women's ranking work problems appeared no sooner than in the third place. Women reported worries, interpersonal problems, and marital and family discord as the most disturbing factors to sleep (37%). Coffee in the evening had a negative effect on falling asleep. Although a 'nightcap' was considered to improve relaxation on falling asleep, men ranked alcohol as the fourth disturbing factor. Other disturbing factors were stress, irregularities in everyday life because of social events, travelling or atypical catnaps. Eating and exercising too heavily or too late in the evening were found to disturb sleep. On the other hand, temporary lack of exercise seemed to impair the quality of sleep. As external factors disturbing sleep the subjects considered noise, light, too high room temperature, tight clothing, unfamiliar sleeping environment and restless children. Health-related symptoms were also listed as disturbing factors, especially by women and with advancing age. We classified the subjects into good and poor sleepers by an index from nine items describing quality of sleep. The three factors best promoting sleep were mentioned more often by the poor sleepers than by the good sleepers. The poor sleepers also reported psychological factors to promote sleep (24%) significantly more often (P

Suggested Citation

  • Urponen, Helka & Vuori, Ilkka & Hasan, Joel & Partinen, Markku, 1988. "Self-evaluations of factors promoting and disturbing sleep: An epidemiological survey in Finland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 443-450, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:4:p:443-450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90313-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bassett, Emma & Moore, Spencer, 2014. "Neighbourhood disadvantage, network capital and restless sleep: Is the association moderated by gender in urban-dwelling adults?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 185-193.
    2. Knudsen, Hannah K. & Ducharme, Lori J. & Roman, Paul M., 2007. "Job stress and poor sleep quality: Data from an American sample of full-time workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1997-2007, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:4:p:443-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.