IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v26y1988i12p1191-1196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social science and medical education in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Obot, Isidore S.

Abstract

In response to Nigeria's 'old' and seemingly intractable health problems and the emergence of a 'new' epidemiology of behaviour-related and social disorders, there is an urgent need for greater participation of social scientists in the training of front-line health care practitioners and delivery of care. This study was conducted to determine the current extent of involvement of the social sciences in Nigerian medical education. A survey was carried out in all schools/colleges of medicine in the country. Nineteen social scientists, comprising 1 anthropologist, 10 psychologists and 8 sociologists, were identified in 10 of the 12 schools. Questionnaires were sent to all of them and 12 were returned. Analyses of the data collected showed that most psychologists were affiliated with departments of psychiatry and sociologists with community health/social medicine. Psychologists spent most of their time in teaching, clinical work and research (in that order); and sociologists in teaching, research and health care delivery. Most of the social scientists perceived their work as essential in the training of medical doctors and thought that the medical school provided a good opportunity for research. But a significant number of them complained of status inequality with their medically-trained colleagues. This was regarded as one of several obstacles to greater participation of social scientists in Nigerian health care. It was suggested that while social scientists were essential in the training of health care personnel, they needed to diversify their inputs (emphasizing health promotion and disease prevention) in accordance with a broadened and socially relevant view of health and illness.

Suggested Citation

  • Obot, Isidore S., 1988. "Social science and medical education in Nigeria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 1191-1196, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:12:p:1191-1196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(88)90150-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:26:y:1988:i:12:p:1191-1196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.