IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i6p679-687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of socio-behavioural scientists in health care practice

Author

Listed:
  • Hull, F. M.

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyse some of the complex problems that face primary health care practice in the developed world today. These are shown to be a degree of depersonalisation, that has come with greater efficiency, and a reduction in the quality of the doctor-patient relationship, which has accompanied increased medical effectiveness. These changes are in turn related to changes in diagnostic methods in primary care, to changes in the organisation of primary care and to change in the stress laid on interventive, preventive and rehabilitative care. All these inter-related problems have to be viewed against a background of shortage of resource which demand a far more stringent system of accountability than has been common until now. A possible solution lies in redefining the traditional medical role and the philosophical basis which underlies that role at a time when primary health care is confronted by thespecial problems of the AIDS pandemic. This would require major alterations in medical attitudes and in established medical education which may be impossible for the doctors to achieve by themselves. It is suggested that a most important role of socio-behavioural scientists lies in helping the medical profession to remove the attitudinal and educational barriers which prevent the realisation of the concept of a new sort of doctor who may cope with the demands of primary health care as we approach 2000.

Suggested Citation

  • Hull, F. M., 1987. "The role of socio-behavioural scientists in health care practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 679-687, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:679-687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90095-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:679-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.