IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i5p495-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community water-contact patterns and the transmission of schistosoma haematobium in the highveld region of Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Chandiwana, Stephen K.

Abstract

The patterns of community water-contact, their relationships to Schistosoma haematobium infection in the human population and also in Bulinus globosus, snail host for S. haematobium and S. mattheei were carried out at 12 human water contact sites located in stream habitats in the temperate highveld region of Zimbabwe over a 27-month period during 1982-1984. It was shown that water contact was markedly heterogeneous with sex, age, type of activity and village location being the major variables affecting water-contact patterns. This heterogeneity in contact appears to be related to variations in levels of infection with S. haematobium among residents of the villages and by sex but in adults high water-contact was not associated with increased levels of infection and this discrepancy is attributed to the influence of acquired immunity in adults. An association was found between total body exposure indices and prevalence of S. haematobium in B. globosus in the cool dry and hot dry period of the year indicating that the level of input of schistosome eggs into water play an important role in determining snail infection rates, although the absence of clearcut relationships between the two parameters in the rainy and post-rainy periods suggest that other factors may be involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandiwana, Stephen K., 1987. "Community water-contact patterns and the transmission of schistosoma haematobium in the highveld region of Zimbabwe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 495-505, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:5:p:495-505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90173-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:5:p:495-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.