IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i3p251-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A measure of the 'sick' label in psychiatric disorder and physical illness

Author

Listed:
  • Beiser, Morton
  • Waxler-Morrison, Nancy
  • Iacono, William G.
  • Lin, Tsung-Yi
  • Fleming, Jonathan A.E.
  • Husted, Janice

Abstract

Persons with psychotic disorders recieve devalued labels. Despite considerable theorizing, the proposition that these labels affect the course of psychotic illness has rarely been subjected to investigation. The lack of an adequate operational measure for the labeling construct has hampered research. The present report describes the development of the Social Response Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of the 'sick' label which incorporates moralistic attitudes, fear of dangerousness and negative expectations attached to the role of the severely psychiatrically ill. This 32-item scale, a multidimensional measure of informal labeling, which may be administered in a self-report format or to significant others, permits the study of dose-response relationships. The SRQ is internally stable. It also exhibits construct validity. Schizophrenics and persons with affective psychosis label themselves and are labeled by others more harshly than persons with Crohn's disease or normals. While self-percepts and the perceptions of significant others are fairly congruent for normals and persons with a significant physical illness, there is no agreement between the self-ratings of psychotics and their significant others. Psychotic persons view themselves more negatively than Crohn's disease sufferers or normals, but not as negatively as their therapists, families and friends. Potential uses for the SRQ in longitudinal research are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Beiser, Morton & Waxler-Morrison, Nancy & Iacono, William G. & Lin, Tsung-Yi & Fleming, Jonathan A.E. & Husted, Janice, 1987. "A measure of the 'sick' label in psychiatric disorder and physical illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 251-261, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:3:p:251-261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90228-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:3:p:251-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.