IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i10p1095-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological research and chronic low back pain: A stand-still or breakthrough?

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Anton J. M.
  • Arntz, Arnoud

Abstract

Some of the main psychological research topics concerning chronic low back pain (CLBP) are critically discussed. These topics include: 1. 1. research aimed at describing a specific low back pain personality profile, 2. 2. research into the predictability of therapy results on the basis of psychological assessment, and 3. 3. outcome research of psychologically-oriented treatment for CLBP. It is concluded that these topics provide little insight into the role of psychological factors in the development and maintenance of CLBP. Based on the few empirical studies available, some new and promising directions for future research are proposed, aimed at gaining a better insight into the CLBP syndrome itself. Discussed are: 1. 1. Risk factors in the transition from acute to chronic LBP, 2. 2. the deviant sensitivity to acute, experimental pain stimuli of CLBP patients, 3. 3. the relationship between CLBP behavior and psychophysiologic variables, 4. 4. determinants of CLBP behavior, with special attention to endurance, 5. 5. the deviant processing of proprioceptive stimuli, and 6. 6. the implementation for chronic pain of the unpredictability and uncontrollability paradigms. The emphasis in the presentation of these new topics is more on raising questions than on answering them.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Anton J. M. & Arntz, Arnoud, 1987. "Psychological research and chronic low back pain: A stand-still or breakthrough?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1095-1104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:10:p:1095-1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90350-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:10:p:1095-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.