IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v24y1987i4p359-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A randomized control trial of cardiac rehabilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Burgess, Ann W.
  • Lerner, Debra J.
  • D'Agostino, Ralph B.
  • Vokonas, Pantel S.
  • Hartman, Carol R.
  • Gaccione, Peter

Abstract

A randomized trial using controls tested whether psycho-social rehabilitation of acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients would improve significantly their return to work rate and assessed the importance of various psychological, social, occupational, socio-demographic, and medical factors in facilitating or impeding rapid return to work. Eighty-nine patients were assigned randomly to participate in an experimental cardiac rehabilitation program (rehab care), and 91 patients were controls who received conventional hospital rehabilitation (usual care). By the first follow-up interview at three months, patients assigned to experimental treatment were significantly less distressed psychologically and less dependent on family support than controls (P = 0.04 and P = 0.05, respectively). By the final follow-up interview at 13 months, there was a marginally significant difference in favor of the experimental group in the frequency of reported deterrents to work resumption (P = 0.07). However, the intervention did not result in a statistically significant difference in the return to work rate (P >; 0.10). In each group, 88% were back at work by approximately the first year after infarction. In addition, the two groups were similar in the amount of time patients remained out of the workforce (median days rehab CARE = 75, usual CARE = 81; P > 0.10). A multi-stage data analysis procedure utilizing the Cox regression technique indicated that while several independent variables had significant univariate associations with the length of time patients convalesced, outcome was most influenced by the patient's initial cardiological status and clinical course, by the patterns of family support, and by the several variables measuring the presence of obstacles to resuming work. Our findings suggest that rehabilitation programs intervening on multiple levels (psychological, social, occupational, and physical) may best meet the needs of chronically ill cardiac patients. Results indicate that implementing measures addressing the patient's general psycho-social adjustment to MI may improve existing programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Burgess, Ann W. & Lerner, Debra J. & D'Agostino, Ralph B. & Vokonas, Pantel S. & Hartman, Carol R. & Gaccione, Peter, 1987. "A randomized control trial of cardiac rehabilitation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 359-370, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:4:p:359-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90154-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:4:p:359-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.