IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Health care policy and regional epidemiology: International comparisons and a case-study from the Netherlands

Listed author(s):
  • Mackenbach, J.P.
Registered author(s):

    In a number of countries, regional levels of administration have assumed responsibilities for the health care sector. This paper presents a specification of epidemiological information that could be relevant for health care policy towards and within regions, as well as a review of British and Scandinavian attempts at using routinely available mortality data for these purposes. A Dutch case study is then presented. To determine whether regional mortality data by cause of death can be used as indicators of need for health care, and consequently be used as criteria for the allocation of financial resources, the correspondence between provincial disease-specific mortality, hospital admissions and new cases of disability benefits was analyzed. The findings were not convincing: for a number of diseases a reasonable correspondence between mortality and hospital admissions could be shown; for other conditions, however, especially ischaemic heart disease, none at all. It is concluded that: in the context of the formal allocation of health care resources to administrative units, a strong confidence in mortality data by cause of death is unwarranted; in the (broader) context of developing and evaluating regional health care policy, mortality data by cause of death can be useful for providing a focus on population health status and a starting point for further studies.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 24 (1987)
    Issue (Month): 3 (January)
    Pages: 247-253

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:3:p:247-253
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:3:p:247-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.