IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v24y1987i2p169-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of holistic medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Patel, Mahesh S.

Abstract

As an increasingly informed public becomes more and more disillusioned withthe failure of scientific medicine to live up to its promises and to fullfll popular expectations, attention has been turning to 'holistic,' 'traditional,' 'alternative' or 'complementary' medicine. Forms of medical treatment such as acupuncture, homeopathy, and ayurvedic medicine have infrequently been rigorously evaluated. This paper reviews the traditional structures of clinical and economic evaluation of health care, and then describes a particular set of specific problems that would be encountered in applying these techniques to 'holistic' medicine under the headings 'reductionism' (bias from excluding certain categories of effects), 'taxonomic difficulties' (problems inherent in the choice of diagnostic criteria), and the 'logical basis for comparison' (procedural difficulties). Various methods for comparing the results of different schools of medical thought are suggested and evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Patel, Mahesh S., 1987. "Evaluation of holistic medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 169-175, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:2:p:169-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90249-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:2:p:169-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.