IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v24y1987i11p945-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoidable burden of illness: How much can prevention contribute to health?

Author

Listed:
  • Gunning-Schepers, Louise J.
  • Hagen, J. Hans

Abstract

The WHO campaign for health for all the year 2000 brought health back into the centre of attention in health policy making. Different authors have analysed the determinants of health in different models. One of these is the well-known model of Lalonde, in which health is seen as the result of four determinants: human biology, life style, environment and health care. Dever, in the U.S., has tried to quantify this model in order to compare the percentages of mortality attributable to each of the four determinants with the percentage of resources from the health care budget, allocated to them. The authors have, individually, tried to replicate these estimates, through a survey of Dutch experts. The results of these surveys are presented and discussed. The authors conclude that, although a quantification of the relative importance of the determinants of health would be extremely useful in health policy making, the methodology proposed by Dever does not yield suitable results. An alternative approach suggesred, would be to subdivide the broad determinants into known risk factors and to arrive at a quantification through the utilization of known epidemiologic relationships between risk factors and disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunning-Schepers, Louise J. & Hagen, J. Hans, 1987. "Avoidable burden of illness: How much can prevention contribute to health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 24(11), pages 945-951, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:11:p:945-951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90287-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Birch, 1999. "The 39 steps: the mystery of health inequalities in the UK," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 301-308, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:24:y:1987:i:11:p:945-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.