IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i8p773-780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors related to the use of ambulatory mental health services in three providers plans

Author

Listed:
  • Diehr, Paula
  • Price, Kurt
  • Williams, Stephen J.
  • Matin, Diane P.

Abstract

The use of ambulatory mental health (MH) services by adults was studied in three provider plans: Blue Cross (BC), Group Health Cooperative (GHC) and United Healthcare(UHC), and experimental new plan in which a patient's primary care physician managed all of his care. Approximately 8.3% of the enrollees in each plan had some MH use in the 18 months of the study. We studied correlates of MH use (yea/no). Sex was not a significant predictor of MH use. In general, worse health and lower socioeconomic status (SES) were correlated with having at least one MH visit, but better health and higher SES were correlated with a higher quantity of use for those who had some MH use. The three insurance plans did not differ significantly in the proportion of people who had any MH services, but BC users of MH services had 2-3 times more visits and higher costs than GHC and IHC users. This suggests that the reliance on primary care providers in UHC and GHC may have changed the nature of MH care as compared to Blue Cross. The effects of income, MH need and symptom sensitivity on MH use were different among the three plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Diehr, Paula & Price, Kurt & Williams, Stephen J. & Matin, Diane P., 1986. "Factors related to the use of ambulatory mental health services in three providers plans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 773-780, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:8:p:773-780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90274-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:8:p:773-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.