IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i7p701-708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of Nigerian physicians toward a national health service

Author

Listed:
  • Umeh, Joseph C.
  • Freeman, Robert A.
  • Garner, Dowey D.
  • Blevins, David E.

Abstract

Despite efforts to improve health services in Nigeria, considerable problems in distribution and access persist. At present, the health care system in Nigeria is organized and financed at the states' level rather than at the national level. A severe maldistribution of resources exists, as does a lack of coordication among states. An alternative system, albeit expensive, is a National Health Service (NHS). The purpose of this research is to quantify physicians' attitudes towards the concept of NHS. Although physicians in Nigeria are mandated to provide government-funded support, a substantial private practice thrives. Accordingly, physicians' attitudes that may be transferred into behavior are a major determinate of a potential NHS' long term success. In summary, Hausa physicians from the north tended to be more favorable to NHS than did others. Also, younger physicians and those who believed Nigeria's present system to be inadequate favored NHS. There was no association between a physician's gender, locus of medical education, and source of support for medication education and attitude. Finally, physicians in private practice and those in urban areas held more negative attitudes. In spite of Nigeria's present difficulties, a NHS may become a viable alternative. At this point, the overall concept is not opposed by physicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Umeh, Joseph C. & Freeman, Robert A. & Garner, Dowey D. & Blevins, David E., 1986. "Attitudes of Nigerian physicians toward a national health service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 701-708, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:7:p:701-708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90118-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:7:p:701-708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.