IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i5p519-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role ambiguity in general practice: The care of patients dying at home

Author

Listed:
  • Still, A. W.
  • Todd, C. J.

Abstract

Semi-structured interviews were given to 22 GPs to investigate their perceptions and strategies when dealing with dying patients. There seemed no clear division in practice between policies of telling and not telling patients about their illness. Most patients find out eventually, but GPs differ in the extent to which they aim for open discussions of the matter. Over half perceived care of the dying as a demanding but satisfying fulfilment of their professional skills, but nearly a quarter found it difficult and with few compensating rewards. We conclude that while there is a well established ideal type corresponding to the curative role, there is another which is still in the process of development. This type generates a role for doctors which parallels the patient's dying role, as distinct from the sick role.

Suggested Citation

  • Still, A. W. & Todd, C. J., 1986. "Role ambiguity in general practice: The care of patients dying at home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 519-525, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:5:p:519-525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90012-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:5:p:519-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.