IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i4p387-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidentiality expectations of patients in teaching hospital clinics versus private practice offices

Author

Listed:
  • Weiss, Barry D.
  • Senf, Janet H.
  • Carter, John Z.
  • Rothe, Thomas C.

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty patients at a university hospital teaching clinic and 200 patients in a small private medical office were questioned about their expectations for confidentiality. It was found that in general, subjects in both groups had similar expectations of how physicians handle confidential information. This included physician behavior in situations such as discussing cases with other physicians for second opinions, submitting cases to medical journals, and discussing cases at parties or with spouses and friends. The similarity existed despite demographic differences between the two groups and despite marked differences in the two practice settings. A few differences between the groups were noted, however, University clinic patients were more likely than private office patients (54.5% vs 38.5%) to expect that cases are discussed at large physicians' meetings. Private office patients were more likely (77.8% vs 67%) to expect physicians to discuss cases with nurses. Men in both practice settings were more likely than women to believe that physicians commonly submit cases to medical journals (75.8% vs 59.9%), or discuss cases with nurses (81% vs 67%), non-medical friends (10.9% vs 4.4%), spouses (53% vs 36.4%), and at parties with physicians (56.4% vs 39.6%).

Suggested Citation

  • Weiss, Barry D. & Senf, Janet H. & Carter, John Z. & Rothe, Thomas C., 1986. "Confidentiality expectations of patients in teaching hospital clinics versus private practice offices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 387-391, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:4:p:387-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90081-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    confidentiality medical ethics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:4:p:387-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.