IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v23y1986i10p1017-1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bovine leukosis: An example of poor disease monitoring of international livestock shipments to developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Odend'hal, Stewart

Abstract

Over the past few years, cattle imported into a number of countries have been shown to carry antibodies against bovine leukosis virus (BLV), the cause of enzootic bovine leukosis. The disease, imported into England via shipments of Canadian dairy cattle in the late 1970s, is still a significant problem in the United Kingdom. Many countries now require a blood test for serum antibodies to BLV as a precondition of shipment from certain endemic countries. Those cattle positive for BLV are excluded from shipment. Well-documented cases of shipments of hundreds of Canadian cattle without testing for BLV has been obtained. These shipments were to the African country of Malawi where the BLV status is unknown. Also, although the United States is endemic for BLV, most of the recent live cattle exports were received by countries which did not require a blood test for BLV. Of the 44 countries that imported U.S. cattle during 1982 and 1983, only 13 required BLV antibody testing before shipment. This report concerns one disease in one species. The millions of livestock shipped yearly between the countries of the world may harbor many viruses at risk of being introduced into susceptible animal populations. While international animal health agencies are doing a credible job of providing disease surveillance to member countries, there still needs to be improvements in disease information dissemination.

Suggested Citation

  • Odend'hal, Stewart, 1986. "Bovine leukosis: An example of poor disease monitoring of international livestock shipments to developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 23(10), pages 1017-1020, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:10:p:1017-1020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90259-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:23:y:1986:i:10:p:1017-1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.