IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v22y1986i5p571-578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing surgical risks in a population: Patient histories before and after cholecystectomy

Author

Listed:
  • Roos, Noralou P.
  • Danzinger, Rudy

Abstract

Claims data from the Manitoba Health Services Commission on all health care contacts during the 2 years preceding and the 2 years following gallbladder surgery were used to describe the histories of patients prior to cholecystectomy, and to assess surgical outcomes. The study is unique in focusing on essentially all patients in the population undergoing surgery (whether at large academic centres or small rural hospitals) and in tracking post discharge events (deaths and complications). Many patients presenting for surgery with acute/urgent conditions were previously asymptomatic or at least their gallbladder disease was undiagnosed (27%). Although overall mortality rates were low (0.7%), 26% of the deaths occurred following discharge from the hospital where surgery was performed. In addition, 3.4% of the patients were readmitted to hospital with complications of the gallbladder surgery, 13.5% continued to visit the physician with abdominal symptoms after surgery and 17% presented with psychological problems. Multiple logistic regression is used to estimate the risk of poor surgical outcomes according to a patient's presurgical characteristics. The analysis suggests that most published data are biased towards underestimating the risks associated with cholecystectomy (as well as the risks associated with other common surgical procedures).

Suggested Citation

  • Roos, Noralou P. & Danzinger, Rudy, 1986. "Assessing surgical risks in a population: Patient histories before and after cholecystectomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 571-578, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:5:p:571-578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(86)90024-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:22:y:1986:i:5:p:571-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.