IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v21y1985i4p383-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chiropractic and the clinical art

Author

Listed:
  • Coulehan, John L.

Abstract

Chiropractic is the largest 'unorthodox' health profession in the U.S.A. It is licensed in all 50 states and its services are covered by governmental and private health insurance. Yet chiropractic remains, in the opinion of medical commentators, an unscientific healing cult. Chiropractic holds that much illness is caused, directly or indirectly, by derangements in homeostasis that result from subtle vertebral malalignments called 'subluxations'. Only a minority of 'straight' chiropractors continue to provide spinal manipulation as their only modality, while the majority 'mixers' have embraced physical therapy, vitamin supplements and a wide variety of drugless treatments. Clinical trials suggest that spinal manipulation itself has short-term benefit in back pain, but the success of chiropractic is not fully explained by that effect. The clinical art, though, as manifested in the chiropractic-patient interaction contributes greatly to chiropractic healing. This process promotes patient acceptance and validation, fulfills expectations, provides explanations and engages the patient's commitment. The same process lies at the core of the 'art of medicine'. Seeing the clinical art as it functions in chiropractic can help us to understand its independent power in medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Coulehan, John L., 1985. "Chiropractic and the clinical art," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 383-390, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:4:p:383-390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90218-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:4:p:383-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.