IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The demand for prescription drugs as a function of cost-sharing

Listed author(s):
  • Leibowitz, Arleen
  • Manning, Willard G.
  • Newhouse, Joseph P.

This paper estimates how cost-sharing affects the use of prescription drugs. The data for this analysis are derived from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment (HIE), a randomized controlled trial that randomly assigned participants to insurance plans with varying coinsurance rates and deductibles. Therefore, the cost-sharing they faced was independent of their health and demographic characteristics. The paper used HIE data from four sites to estimate how drug expenditures vary by insurance plan, and to compare the plan response for drugs with that for all ambulatory expenses. The findings show that: (1) individuals with more generous insurance buy more prescription drugs; (2) the cost-sharing response for drugs is similar to the response for all ambulatory medical services; (3) the Dayton, Ohio site had signifivantly greater drug expenditures per capita than the other sites studied and a significantly higher proportion of drugs sold by physicians; and (4) the proportion of brand-name drugs among all drugs purchased in pharmacies was not a function of insurance plan. In the Dayton, Ohio site, a significantly higher proportion of the drugs purchased in pharmacies were brand-name rather than generic.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 21 (1985)
Issue (Month): 10 (January)
Pages: 1063-1069

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1063-1069
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:21:y:1985:i:10:p:1063-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.