IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i6p601-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cost-benefit analysis of the Quebec network of genetic medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Dagenais, Denyse L.
  • Courville, Léon
  • Dagenais, Marcel G.

Abstract

Certain serious diseases, including several major genetic disorders, cannot be treated effectively unless they are detected before symptoms appear. In such cases, only systematic population screening can ensure that the necessary preventive treatment can be administered to affected individuals. The question of whether to establish such screening programs, which may be relatively costly, is a problem for many public administrations. This study of the costs and benefits of the Quebec Network of Genetic Medicine has as its main objective the development of an analytical framework which can be generally applied to such problems. In this article, we attempt to evaluate the profitability of the Network to society. For the evaluation of the less tangible costs and benefits, we adopted the minimum profitability principle, which essentially involves establishing a lower bound on the value of the profitability of the Network. The net benefits assessed by this study, although certainly underestimated, are still very significant. Since the Network is administered by a team of researchers, the study also throws some light on the links existing between research and development activities on the one hand and public services on the other, and hence on the general question of the socioeconomic profitability of biomedical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Dagenais, Denyse L. & Courville, Léon & Dagenais, Marcel G., 1985. "A cost-benefit analysis of the Quebec network of genetic medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 601-607, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:6:p:601-607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90399-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:6:p:601-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.