IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i3p223-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dietary beliefs in health and illness among a Hong Kong community

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, Suzanne S. Y. Chan

Abstract

Dietary adjustment for health promotion and maintenance and for helping the body to expedite its recovery from illness condotions has been part and parcel of the Chinese medical culture. The paper reports on the extent traditional dietary beliefs in health and illness persist in a fast changing Hong Kong community. It explores the community interpretation of the role of diet therapy; and the relationship of social demographic variables with peoples' tendency to give traditional dietary suggestions. Traditional beliefs were found to be quite prevalent. Differentiation in responses was seen for different types of belief concepts. Over 80% of respondents had strong belief in the role of diet in expediting recovery during illnesses. Measles and anaemia were used as indicators to look at the types of foods suggested for consumption or avoidance and the rationale behind the suggestions. Explanations of diet therapy for measles were in general traditionally based and that for anaemia were based on a mix of traditional and modern concepts. While there is a tendency for the more Chinese culturally affiliated in this study population to have stronger traditional food beliefs, the relationship of social demographic factors with the tendency to give dietary suggestions for specific diseases are not clear. Diet therapy is a form of self-care and is an inseparable part of the total health care system in the community. The efficacy of traditional food remedies and the role of diet therapy in self-care should be further explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, Suzanne S. Y. Chan, 1985. "Dietary beliefs in health and illness among a Hong Kong community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 223-230, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:223-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90235-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:223-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.