IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i3p207-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of community health workers in Nicaragua

Author

Listed:
  • Scholl, Edward A.

Abstract

In 1981, the Ministry of Health of Nicaragua began a series of health campaigns whose front-line workers were volunteers from the community called 'brigadistas'. These volunteers have since evolved into a type of community health worker with a multi-disciplinary role and are now called 'primary health care brigadistas'. These brigadistas were formed with the intention of encouraging local community involvement in health and as a means of overcoming rural health manpower shortages. However, in field research at two sites, these primary health care brigadistas were found to have rather limited roles and were dependent upon the nurse auxiliary for direction. A current debate in the Ministry of Health centers around the future role of the brigadistas and their degree of accountability to the Ministry of Health and the Popular Organizations. This article suggests that the brigadistas may be underutilized at present and that increasing their training and expanding their role may be necessary to adequately meet rural health care needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Scholl, Edward A., 1985. "An assessment of community health workers in Nicaragua," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 207-214, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:207-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90233-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riviere-Cinnamond, Ana, 2005. "Animal Health Policy and Practice: Scaling-up Community-based Animal Health Systems, Lessons from Human Health," PPLPI Working Papers 23775, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:3:p:207-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.