IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v20y1985i2p133-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional socialization and social control: From medical students to general practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Baszanger, Isabelle

Abstract

Most American research considers the assimilation of the norms and values of a given profession to be the most important way in which that profession controls the socialization of its future members. This view of social control is based on a problematic pattern of socialization. Using the results of a research into the socialization of general practitioners, a different approach to this problem of social control is suggested that takes into account the specific manner of integration into the university-hospital structures and the ways in which future doctors gain access to the professional world. The hospital with its scientific logic is thus the chief instrument of social control, even though this control is limited by the very nature of the hospital: hospital training only partly controls the application of this scientific knowledge by general practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Baszanger, Isabelle, 1985. "Professional socialization and social control: From medical students to general practitioners," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 133-143, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:2:p:133-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(85)90298-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurok, Michael & Henckes, Nicolas, 2009. "Between professional values and the social valuation of patients: The fluctuating economy of pre-hospital emergency work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 504-510, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:20:y:1985:i:2:p:133-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.