IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v209y2018icp25-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of intimate partner violence on women's contraceptive use: Evidence from the Rakai Community Cohort Study in Rakai, Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Maxwell, Lauren
  • Brahmbhatt, Heena
  • Ndyanabo, Anthony
  • Wagman, Jennifer
  • Nakigozi, Gertrude
  • Kaufman, Jay S.
  • Nalugoda, Fred
  • Serwadda, David
  • Nandi, Arijit

Abstract

A systematic review of longitudinal studies suggests that intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with reduced contraceptive use, but most included studies were limited to two time points. We used seven waves of data from the Rakai Community Cohort Study in Rakai, Uganda to estimate the effect of prior year IPV at one visit on women's current contraceptive use at the following visit. We used inverse probability of treatment-weighted marginal structural models (MSMs) to estimate the relative risk of current contraceptive use comparing women who were exposed to emotional, physical, and/or sexual IPV during the year prior to interview to those who were not. We accounted for time-fixed and time-varying confounders and prior IPV and adjusted standard errors for repeated measures within individuals. The analysis included 7923 women interviewed between 2001 and 2013. In the weighted MSMs, women who experienced any form of prior year IPV were 20% less likely to use condoms at last sex than women who had not (95% CI: 0.12, 0.26). We did not find evidence that IPV affects current use of modern contraception (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.03); however, current use of a partner-dependent method was 27% lower among women who reported any form of prior-year IPV compared to women who had not (95% CI: 0.20, 0.33). Women who experienced prior-year IPV were less likely to use condoms and other forms of contraception that required negotiation with their male partners and more likely to use contraception that they could hide from their male partners. Longitudinal studies in Rakai and elsewhere have found that women who experience IPV have a higher rate of HIV than women who do not. Our finding that women who experience IPV are less likely to use condoms may help explain the relation between IPV and HIV.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxwell, Lauren & Brahmbhatt, Heena & Ndyanabo, Anthony & Wagman, Jennifer & Nakigozi, Gertrude & Kaufman, Jay S. & Nalugoda, Fred & Serwadda, David & Nandi, Arijit, 2018. "The impact of intimate partner violence on women's contraceptive use: Evidence from the Rakai Community Cohort Study in Rakai, Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 25-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:209:y:2018:i:c:p:25-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361830217X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yemi Adewoyin & Clifford O. Odimegwu & Olatunji Alabi & Joshua O. Akinyemi & Olusola A. Omisakin, 2022. "Intimate partner violence and the spatial pattern of maternal healthcare services utilization among parous married women in northern Nigeria," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 617-636, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:209:y:2018:i:c:p:25-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.