IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i2p177-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutritional thriftiness and human reproduction: Beyond the critical body composition hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Quandt, Sara A.

Abstract

The 'critical body composition hypothesis' (CBCH) is frequently used to explain variations in the duration of postpartum amenorrhea. The hypothesis predicts that ovulation will not occur if fat reserves fall below a critical threshold. This paper attempts to analytically separate the CBCH from the broader concept of nutritional thriftiness on which it is based. A review of previous research on fat cell metabolism and ovulation finds no direct link between fatness and fecundity. Rather they are each regulated by lactation and mother-infant interactions associated with breast feeding. As a system which delivers available fat into breast milk and prevents ovulation only during the time when the infant is dependent on the mother, the pathways outlined here represent a nutritionally thrifty method of fertility regulation, one which maximizes reproductive success while minimizing energy investment. The cultural patterning both of infant feeding behaviors and the wider range of maternal activities which affect breast feeding suggest specific testable hypotheses to explain interpopulation variations in fertility and infant nutritional status.

Suggested Citation

  • Quandt, Sara A., 1984. "Nutritional thriftiness and human reproduction: Beyond the critical body composition hypothesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 177-182, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:2:p:177-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90285-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:2:p:177-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.