IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i11p1213-1216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bystander in highway injury accidents

Author

Listed:
  • Brodsky, Harold

Abstract

The response of the bystander, or passerby, at the scene of an injury highway accident is an important but neglected aspect of an emergency medical system. Delays in notification, or long distances, may cause an ambulance to take a half-hour or more to get to a crash site, particularly in a rural area. Until medical help arrives there may be a need for someone willing and capable of providing basic life support for the injured. Good Samaritan laws alone cannot be expected to encourage positive bystander responses. What might help is an awareness of the problem and forethought on the part of individuals and communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Brodsky, Harold, 1984. "The bystander in highway injury accidents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(11), pages 1213-1216, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1213-1216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90373-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niki Matinrad & Melanie Reuter-Oppermann, 2022. "A review on initiatives for the management of daily medical emergencies prior to the arrival of emergency medical services," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(1), pages 251-302, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1213-1216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.