IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v19y1984i11p1173-1180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The utilisation of preschool health and education services

Author

Listed:
  • Fergusson, D.M.
  • Dimond, M.E.
  • Horwood, L.J.
  • Shannon, F.T.

Abstract

The distribution of the utilisation of health and education services during the period from birth to 5 years was studied in a birth cohort of New Zealand children. Overall patterns of service utilisation showed the presence of considerable inequities with children in the lowest 8% of the distribution receiving seven or fewer of the available services in contrast to the children in the top 8% of the distribution who received in excess of 15 services. Patterns of service utilisation showed a clear tendency to vary with the child's social and familial characteristics with children from socially disadvantaged home backgrounds, unplanned and later born children, children from economically depressed home environments and children in families facing various forms of stress and adversity showing a clear tendency to receive less care than other children. Path modelling of the results suggested that the child's family social background and family composition made the largest direct contributions to variations in rates of service utilisation with family economic situation and levels of adversity having smaller but nonetheless statistically significant effects. It is concluded that the findings provide a clear case study of the way in which well intentioned social policies may emphasise rather than eliminate inequities in the care received by children.

Suggested Citation

  • Fergusson, D.M. & Dimond, M.E. & Horwood, L.J. & Shannon, F.T., 1984. "The utilisation of preschool health and education services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 19(11), pages 1173-1180, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1173-1180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90367-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:19:y:1984:i:11:p:1173-1180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.