IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v18y1984i10p855-859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population and health in the developing world: Research perspectives for medical anthropologists

Author

Listed:
  • Ford, Thomas R.
  • Arcury, Thomas A.

Abstract

Because of the health consequences of population changes, medical anthropologists should find many demographic studies of relevance to their own research interests. Using the research priorities identified by the International Review Group of Social Science Research on Population and Development as a framework, this paper discusses opportunities for anthropologists to make significant contributions to both demographic knowledge and population policy in the developing world. The research priorities include descriptive studies, program evaluation, formulation of population theory, analysis of the political processes involved in population policy development, and studies of the relations among development style, population processes and population policies. There is an explicit recognition of the need for studies that go beyond demographic statistical associations, and an appeal for the grounded research that anthropologists are trained to provide. Anthropologists interested in population research should get some basic training in demography. Their most fruitful contributions are likely to be made as members of multidisciplinary teams involved in population research or planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ford, Thomas R. & Arcury, Thomas A., 1984. "Population and health in the developing world: Research perspectives for medical anthropologists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(10), pages 855-859, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:10:p:855-859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(84)90154-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:18:y:1984:i:10:p:855-859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.