IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i5p259-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a client-focused allocation statistic of inpatient nursing resource use: An alternative to the patient day

Author

Listed:
  • Caterinicchio, Russell Paul
  • Davies, Robert H.

Abstract

A sample survey (N = 2660) was conducted at eight acute care hospitals in New Jersey during an 11-month period between 1979 and 1981 in order to develop a client-focused, case-mix sensitive measure of resource use for the allocation of inpatient general nursing costs. Using general linear modelling techniques, the direct and indirect effects of age, length of stay, multiple diagnoses, multiple procedures, the ratio of special care unit days to length of stay and the effects of the presence of surgery, admission status, discharge status and membership in Major Diagnostic Categories on indexed total units of nursing service were explored. The results of the analysis suggested that length of stay is the most significant predictor of indexed nursing units of service regardless of age and the complexity of the medical problem when case-mix is controlled through the assignment of cases to 13 nursing services isoresource clusters. The methodology yields an empirically derived patient-specific, case-mix adjusted length of stay statistic which can be used to apportion nursing costs by the case. The approach permits the estimation of nursing units of service which reflect the relative amount of nursing inputs and corresponding costs of direct patient care consumed by any given inpatient in any given hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • Caterinicchio, Russell Paul & Davies, Robert H., 1983. "Developing a client-focused allocation statistic of inpatient nursing resource use: An alternative to the patient day," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 259-272, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:5:p:259-272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90328-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:5:p:259-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.