IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i4p235-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young people's knowledge of the cervical smear test

Author

Listed:
  • Charlton, Anne

Abstract

A sample of three hundred and forty-eight 16 and 17-year-old students (120 boys and 228 girls) on a range of vocational courses were asked a number of questions about the cervical smear test in October 1980. 10% of the boys and 27% of the girls selected "smear" as a word they would associate with cancer, but only 3.3% of the boys and 9.2% of the girls mentioned the cervical smear test as a preventive measure. Approximately a quarter of the students considered cervical cancer to be usually curable with early treatment, and the majority considered it to be rarely curable with late treatment. 38% of the boys and 64% of the girls had heard of the cervical smear test and the doctor, clinic, family planning clinic and hospital were suggested as places where the smear is available. 9% of the girls said they had had a smear test. These results were used as a baseline for the designing of suitable teaching material.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlton, Anne, 1983. "Young people's knowledge of the cervical smear test," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 235-239, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:4:p:235-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90121-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:4:p:235-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.