IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v17y1983i2p95-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separated and divorced women compared with married controls : Selected life satisfaction, stress and health indices from a community survey

Author

Listed:
  • Tcheng-Laroche, Françoise
  • Prince, Raymond

Abstract

A stratified sample of 31 French-Canadian and 33 English-Canadian separated or divorced (S/D) mothers and matched married controls were identified by telephone in four high-income census tracts of Montreal. The 128 women were home-interviewed by questionnaire which included extensive sections on health, stress and life satisfaction. It was predicted that modern S/D women with children would be better off as regards satisfaction, stress and health than pre-women's liberation era women, and that they would be as well or better off than the married controls. These hypotheses were supported only in part. The S/D were significantly worse off than the married in four areas (general life satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, self-esteem and use of professional therapists) and on almost all other health-stress measures, there were trends favouring the married. There were no significant differences or no trends favouring the S/D. Nonetheless, the S/D did appear to be considerably better off when compared with the picture of the S/D in the earlier literature. The greater frequency of depressions and greater use of therapists by the English-Canadian women was thought to reflect their weaker network of supportive relatives as well as the impact of recent political changes in Quebec.

Suggested Citation

  • Tcheng-Laroche, Françoise & Prince, Raymond, 1983. "Separated and divorced women compared with married controls : Selected life satisfaction, stress and health indices from a community survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 95-105, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:2:p:95-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(83)90360-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:17:y:1983:i:2:p:95-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.