IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v179y2017icp210-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The policy work of piloting: Mobilising and managing conflict and ambiguity in the English NHS

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey, Simon
  • Checkland, Kath
  • Hodgson, Damian
  • McBride, Anne
  • Elvey, Rebecca
  • Parkin, Stephen
  • Rothwell, Katy
  • Pierides, Dean

Abstract

In spite of their widespread use in policy making in the UK and elsewhere, there is a relatively sparse literature specifically devoted to policy pilots. Recent research on policy piloting has focused on the role of pilots in making policy work in accordance with national agendas. Taking this as a point of departure, the present paper develops the notion of pilots doing policy work. It does this by situating piloting within established theories of policy formulation and implementation, and illustrating using an empirical case. Our case is drawn from a qualitative policy ethnography of a local government pilot programme aiming to extend access to healthcare services. Our case explores the collective entrepreneurship of regional policy makers together with local pilot volunteers. We argue that pilots work to mobilise and manage the ambiguity and conflict associated with particular policy goals, and in their structure and design, shape action towards particular outcomes. We conclude with a discussion of the generative but managed role which piloting affords to local implementers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey, Simon & Checkland, Kath & Hodgson, Damian & McBride, Anne & Elvey, Rebecca & Parkin, Stephen & Rothwell, Katy & Pierides, Dean, 2017. "The policy work of piloting: Mobilising and managing conflict and ambiguity in the English NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 210-217.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:179:y:2017:i:c:p:210-217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617300825
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wuliyasu Bai & Long Zhang & Liang Yan & Xinyi Wang & Zhiqiao Zhou, 2023. "Crop Straw Resource Utilization as Pilot Policy in China: An Event History Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:179:y:2017:i:c:p:210-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.