IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i6p687-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The optimum utilization and appropriate responsibilities of allied health professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Celentano, David D.

Abstract

A number of issues related to the optimum utilization and appropriate responsibilities of allied health professionals are raised based upon the perspective of the experience of the U.S. in recent years. Various definitions and concepts related to these issues are presented in order to assess the state of both training and use of allied health professionals in diverse settings. It is suggested that idiosyncratic needs and solutions in specific cultural contexts do not allow a generalizable conclusion to be drawn, although several principles can be put forward. The experience in the development and training of allied health professionals in the U.S. is analyzed using a variety of frameworks, including structural-organizational models as well as an historical approach. An empirical example of the extent and level of responsibilities of a variety of types of allied health professionals is offered, and the role of associated practice characteristics is observed to impinge upon role performance, giving an insight into the problems and potentials of these manpower resources. Finally, a discussion of the western model as a paradigm for allied health professional training and utilization in the global context is considered, and various strategies and suggestions for the future are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Celentano, David D., 1982. "The optimum utilization and appropriate responsibilities of allied health professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 687-698, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:6:p:687-698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90458-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:6:p:687-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.