IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i22p1959-1969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disease epidemiology and earthquake disaster : The example of Southern Italy after the 23 November 1980 earthquake

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander, David

Abstract

This paper describes aspects of the epidemiological situation following the November 1980 earthquake disaster in Campania and Basilicata, southern Italy. First, population displacements and the fluctuating state of homelessness after the catastrophe are described. Secondly, the level of medical provision prior to the disaster is assessed and damage caused by the earthquake to the medical care and sanitation infrastructures is outlined. Thirdly, the publicity given by news media to the threat of disease is examined and compared with the official government reaction, which took the form of emergency medical provision and intervention against the supposed threat of disease. The national epidemiological surveillance system, which was set up during the aftermath of the disaster, is outlined and some of its results, describing the post-impact epidemiological situation in the disaster zone, are examined. Despite the chaotic situation following the earthquake and the publicity given to the threat of disease outbreaks, there were no serious epidemics and the hospital system was able to cope with the aftermath. The government program of vaccinating survivors and relief volunteers can therefore be seen as an overreaction to the prevailing situation, although continuing disease surveillance was probably a wise precaution.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander, David, 1982. "Disease epidemiology and earthquake disaster : The example of Southern Italy after the 23 November 1980 earthquake," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(22), pages 1959-1969, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:22:p:1959-1969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90399-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:22:p:1959-1969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.