IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i22p1903-1917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unemployment and health in macro-social analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Spruit, Ingeborg P.

Abstract

The hypothesis that unemployment is related to bad health arises from a general acceptance of the relationship between living standards and longevity. To confirm the hypothesis three analytical statements have to be true: 1. (a) an increase of prosperity leads to a decrease of mortality; 2. (b) a decrease of prosperity leads to an increase of mortality; 3. (c) people with the relatively lowest prosperity, in this case the unemployed, have the relatively highest mortality and so are the least healthy. For this purpose important types of macro-social research are described and the results are interpreted, briefly evaluated and discussed. - Research comparing differences in life-expectancy in rich and poor countries, shows rough differences; - Research applying a new method, diffusionalist comparison, shows that increased prosperity does not infinitely lead to improvement of life expectancy; - Research on economic fluctuations and mortality is the only type of research attempting to describe a process, not a state of affairs; - Research on socio-economic categories within countries (classes, neighborhoods) shows differences in mortality and morbidity, but not why these differences exist; - Research on the relationship between a population's body height (as a health indicator) and poorness/ unemployment gives rise to more differentiated conclusions, but neither provides final answers; - Some small retrospective researches with divergent methodologies and using small hospital samples give different results.

Suggested Citation

  • Spruit, Ingeborg P., 1982. "Unemployment and health in macro-social analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(22), pages 1903-1917, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:22:p:1903-1917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90390-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:22:p:1903-1917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.