IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i15p1413-1420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The primary medical care practitioner's attitudes toward psychiatry : An Israeli study

Author

Listed:
  • Link, B.
  • Levav, I.
  • Cohen, A.

Abstract

General practitioners are important to the delivery of mental health care because they perform three important functions, as an identifier, as a referral agent and as a caregiver. This study investigates the importance of the attitudes G.P.s hold on their performance of two of these functions. screening and referring. Relying on items developed in previous investigations, four measures of attitudinal dimensions are developed using factor analysis: Belief in Psychogenesis, Psychiatric Fatalism, Referral Reluctance and G.P. as Caregiver. These attitude dimensions are then related to the functions of screening and referral. Three major findings emerge from the results. First, the attitudinal dimensions uncovered are empirically distinct, suggesting that no single pro-to-anti psychiatry is present. Second, attitudes play a role in the screening of cases. A G.P. is more likely to identify cases if he believes in the psychogenesis of physical disorders, and is not concerned that identification and referral will lead to negative consequences for the patient. Third and finally, attitudes do not play a strong role in the referral of cases once they have been identified as such. The findings are presented and interpreted by referring to the sensitive position G.P.s occupy between the public and the psychiatrist.

Suggested Citation

  • Link, B. & Levav, I. & Cohen, A., 1982. "The primary medical care practitioner's attitudes toward psychiatry : An Israeli study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(15), pages 1413-1420, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:15:p:1413-1420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90136-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:15:p:1413-1420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.