IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i14p1339-1344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological symptoms among Chinese in urban Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Cheung, Fanny M.

Abstract

Clinical observations on Chinese mental patients suggested that somatization was a common mode of symptom presentation. One explanation attributed to the phenomenon was that Chinese tend to suppress or deny their feelings. The present study took the data on the 22-item Langner Scale collected as part of the Hong Kong Biosocial Survey and reanalyzed the responses of 3925 Chinese subjects in terms of Crandell and Dohrenwend's subscales. Results showed that among these urban Chinese, report of psychological symptoms on the Langner Scale was higher than that of psychophysiological, physiological and ambiguous symptoms. Significant differences in subscale scores were found among five subject variables: age, sex, education, socioeconomic status and total number of reported symptoms. Within each subgroup of the subject variables, scores on the psychological subscale was significantly higher than scores on the other three subscales. These findings disputed the contention that Chinese in general tend to deny their emotions. Somatization among Chinese mental patients in medical settings and report of psychological symptoms by Chinese may not be mutually exclusive phenomena. A more meaningful examination of the somatization concept should include investigation of the conceptualization of mental illness among Chinese, the channels chosen for help and symptom presentation in different settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheung, Fanny M., 1982. "Psychological symptoms among Chinese in urban Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(14), pages 1339-1344, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:14:p:1339-1344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90029-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:14:p:1339-1344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.