IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v16y1982i10p1039-1047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey approach to estimating demand for physician assistants

Author

Listed:
  • Scheffler, Richard M.
  • Gillings, Dennis B.

Abstract

A national probability sample of physicians was surveyed by mail to provide an estimate of the number of job openings for physician assistants (PAs). The responses were used to undertake an empirical analysis of the factors which influence a physician's decision to hire a PA. Estimates were adjusted to account for survey non-response. This approach may be useful for estimating the employment demand for other types of health workers employed by physicians. It was found that in 1976 there was an unconditional demand for 20.338 PAs and a further conditional demand for 3417 PAs. This contrasts sharply with the fact that as of March 1977 only 4845 PAs had graduated from training programs. Approximately 53% of this employment demand was from physicians in the primary care specialties (general/family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, internal medicine, and pediatrics). Of note was the finding that physicians expected to pay PAs a lower salary than was being received in the market place. Further, 27% of physicians not willing to hire PAs indicated lack of knowledge about them as the main reason for not hiring.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheffler, Richard M. & Gillings, Dennis B., 1982. "Survey approach to estimating demand for physician assistants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(10), pages 1039-1047, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1039-1047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(82)90176-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:16:y:1982:i:10:p:1039-1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.