IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v15y1981i1p67-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paths to psychotherapy in the middle years: A longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Gurwitz, Paul M.

Abstract

This is a longitudinal study of the antecedents of entry into psychotherapy. The population studied consisted of 123 adults, aged 40-50, who had been subjects of long-term growth studies since childhood or early adolescence. These subjects were grouped according to whether or not they had sought psychotherapy within the period 1958-1970. Discriminant analysis was used to form composites of antecedent personality and life-course indicators that best distinguished those who sought psychotherapy in the study period from those who did not. Indicators of personality included a Q-sorted evaluation of psychological health and a series of assessment scales derived from the California Psychological Inventory; these variables were measured at the beginning of the study period. Indicators of life-events were obtained by systematically coding retrospective open-ended interviews that were conducted with each subject at the end of the study period. The two composites, along with indicators of demographic background, were entered into a path modelling procedure, to predict entry into psychotherapy. The analysis uncovered differences between men and women in the pattern of "therapy-prone" personality and life-course. Men who entered therapy exhibited acting-out and impulsive personality traits, coupled with a life-events profile indicative of role-failure. Women exhibited a general psychological distress profile, with few distinct life-course characteristics. The independent variables accounted for between 57 and 79% of the variance in therapy-seeking; personality and life-course accounted for the bulk of the variation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gurwitz, Paul M., 1981. "Paths to psychotherapy in the middle years: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 67-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:15:y:1981:i:1:p:67-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VBF-4FN1XCS-9/2/f9cf23e6d5f0accf954c095b2acb4bae
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:15:y:1981:i:1:p:67-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.