IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v118y2014icp159-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonization of later life? Laypersons' and users' agency regarding anti-aging medicine in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Schweda, Mark
  • Pfaller, Larissa

Abstract

Anti-aging medicine is regarded as a significant trend in contemporary Western societies. Foucauldian gerontology provides some of the dominant theoretical perspectives on this trend in social and cultural theory. Proceeding from its interpretation and critique of anti-aging in terms of medicalization and responsibilization of aging, we explore by means of qualitative socio-empirical research how interested laypersons as well as non-professional users in the German context actually perceive of and deal with the medical claims and moral imperatives surrounding anti-aging medicine. The study is based on 12 focus groups and 20 narrative interviews (96 participants all included). They were conducted in Germany between 2011 and 2012, and analyzed by qualitative content analysis as well as comparative sequence analysis. The empirical findings indicate that in everyday life, interested laypersons and non-professional users employ different strategies for dealing with anti-aging products and services, corresponding to different degrees of affirmation and rejection. Four strategies could be identified: (a) medical optimism, (b) preventive maximalism, (c) ritualized well-being, and (d) considerate rejection. Also, each type was problematized and arguments against it were expressed. Overall, these findings show how our participants develop viable strategies to put the relevance of medical knowledge and moral imperatives for their own lives into perspective. This sheds light on laypersons' and users' agency—that is, their active role and deliberative space in the uptake, adaptation, and integration of anti-aging into their personal life. These empirical findings contribute to an enriched picture of the actual practice of anti-aging in concrete national and socio-cultural settings. This can help to differentiate the evaluation and thus make its critique more context sensitive, adequate, and targeted.

Suggested Citation

  • Schweda, Mark & Pfaller, Larissa, 2014. "Colonization of later life? Laypersons' and users' agency regarding anti-aging medicine in Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 159-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:118:y:2014:i:c:p:159-165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614005048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mykytyn, Courtney Everts, 2006. "Anti-aging medicine: A patient/practitioner movement to redefine aging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 643-653, February.
    2. Holt, Martin, 2007. "Agency and dependency within treatment: Drug treatment clients negotiating methadone and antidepressants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 1937-1947, May.
    3. Koenig, Christopher J., 2011. "Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(7), pages 1105-1114, April.
    4. Pound, Pandora & Britten, Nicky & Morgan, Myfanwy & Yardley, Lucy & Pope, Catherine & Daker-White, Gavin & Campbell, Rona, 2005. "Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 133-155, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ridge, Damien & Kokanovic, Renata & Broom, Alex & Kirkpatrick, Susan & Anderson, Claire & Tanner, Claire, 2015. "“My dirty little habit”: Patient constructions of antidepressant use and the ‘crisis’ of legitimacy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 53-61.
    2. Zhou, Amy, 2016. "The uncertainty of treatment: Women's use of HIV treatment as prevention in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 52-60.
    3. Malpass, Alice & Shaw, Alison & Sharp, Debbie & Walter, Fiona & Feder, Gene & Ridd, Matthew & Kessler, David, 2009. ""Medication career" or "Moral career"? The two sides of managing antidepressants: A meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 154-168, January.
    4. Allison Williams & Jac Kee Low & Elizabeth Manias & Kimberley Crawford, 2016. "The transplant team's support of kidney transplant recipients to take their prescribed medications: a collective responsibility," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2251-2261, August.
    5. Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis & Janet L Welch, 2017. "Medication‐taking behaviours in chronic kidney disease with multiple chronic conditions: a meta‐ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 586-598, March.
    6. Jyh-Jeng Wu & Yueh-Mei Chen & Paul C. Talley & Kuang-Ming Kuo, 2021. "Does Online Community Participation Contribute to Medication Adherence? An Empirical Study of Patients with Chronic Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Dew, Kevin & Norris, Pauline & Gabe, Jonathan & Chamberlain, Kerry & Hodgetts, Darrin, 2015. "Moral discourses and pharmaceuticalised governance in households," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 272-279.
    8. Tate, Alexandra, 2020. "Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Bernardi, Roberta & Wu, Philip F., 2022. "Online health communities and the patient-doctor relationship: An institutional logics perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    10. Gabe, Jonathan & Williams, Simon J. & Coveney, Catherine M., 2017. "Prescription hypnotics in the news: A study of UK audiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 43-52.
    11. Pickersgill, Martyn & Broer, Tineke & Cunningham-Burley, Sarah & Deary, Ian, 2017. "Prudence, pleasure, and cognitive ageing: Configurations of the uses and users of brain training games within UK media, 2005–2015," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 93-100.
    12. Webster, Michelle, 2017. "Similarities and differences in the meanings children and their parents attach to epilepsy medications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 190-197.
    13. Olivier Lepiller & Geneviève Cazes-Valette, 2018. "Supplementing food for health: practices amongst French adults aged 60 to 75 years," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 253-279, December.
    14. Heritage, John & McArthur, Amanda, 2019. "The diagnostic moment: A study in US primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 262-271.
    15. Gibson, Grant, 2016. "‘Signposts on the journey’; medication adherence and the lived body in men with Parkinson's disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 27-34.
    16. Berry, Brandon & Apesoa-Varano, Ester Carolina, 2017. "Medication takeovers: Covert druggings and behavioral control in Alzheimer's," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 51-59.
    17. Murdoch, Jamie & Salter, Charlotte & Ford, John & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shiner, Alice & Steel, Nicholas, 2020. "The “unknown territory” of goal-setting: Negotiating a novel interactional activity within primary care doctor-patient consultations for patients with multiple chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby & Svennevig, Jan & Gulbrandsen, Pål, 2016. "Negotiating treatment preferences: Physicians' formulations of patients' stance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 26-36.
    19. Zhao, Chunjuan & Ma, Wen, 2020. "Patient resistance towards clinicians’ diagnostic test-taking advice and its management in Chinese outpatient clinic interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    20. Ceuterick, Melissa & Vandebroek, Ina, 2017. "Identity in a medicine cabinet: Discursive positions of Andean migrants towards their use of herbal remedies in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 43-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:118:y:2014:i:c:p:159-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.