IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v105y2026ics0038012126000492.html

Public funding and firm innovation: evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno, Emma
  • Castellano, Rosalia
  • Punzo, Gennaro

Abstract

This study draws on microdata from 1198 German enterprises participating in the 2018 Community Innovation Survey (CIS) to assess the causal impact of public financial support on firms’ innovation outcomes. Based on the theoretical rationale for public intervention in response to market failures, financial constraints and information asymmetries, the analysis uses propensity score matching (PSM) to address selection bias due to the non-random allocation of public funding. Propensity scores are estimated based on a logit model that controls for firm-level characteristics such as size, age, human capital, innovation expenditure, cooperation patterns, and regulatory influences. The findings suggest that public support significantly increases the propensity to introduce innovation, with stronger effect among firms that are already characterized by structured innovation processes and established collaborative networks. The policy implications point to the need for more differentiated, SME-oriented instruments, as well as reduced administrative burdens for smaller firms. This would enhance the accessibility and operational efficiency of support measures and ensure they reach enterprises with high innovation potential but limited organizational resources. Furthermore, the significant impact of R&D investment, innovation expenditure, and collaboration with research organizations highlights the risk that current funding practices may repeatedly benefit the same firms, thereby restricting access to resources for emerging enterprises and limiting their innovation activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno, Emma & Castellano, Rosalia & Punzo, Gennaro, 2026. "Public funding and firm innovation: evidence from Germany," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0038012126000492
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2026.102462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012126000492
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0038012126000492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.