Author
Listed:
- Cheng, Huifang
- Lin, Shengbin
- Hong, Chenxiang
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is profoundly reshaping the landscape of innovation. Using a panel of 2975 Chinese listed companies from 2013 to 2024, this paper applies text-mining techniques to quantify firms’ AI adoption and systematically examines its effects on both innovation quantity and innovation efficiency. The results show that AI adoption markedly increases innovation quantity but simultaneously constrains improvements in innovation efficiency, thus generating a pronounced “quantity-efficiency” paradox. This paradox remains robust across a range of sensitivity analyses and endogeneity adjustments. Mechanism tests reveal three channels through which AI adoption impedes innovation efficiency: reducing the time efficiency of R&D personnel, amplifying managerial expansion, and weakening the absorptive capacity of technical staff. Heterogeneity analyses further indicate that these negative effects are most pronounced in firms with higher human capital intensity, non-state ownership, and technology-intensive activities. Additional evidence shows that although AI adoption improves overall operational efficiency, it diminishes the individual productivity and compensation of R&D employees and exacerbates race-to-the-bottom competition among peer firms, thereby generating substantial negative externalities. By documenting the dual impact of AI adoption on corporate innovation and uncovering its underlying mechanisms—spanning human capital utilization, organizational restructuring, and inter-firm competition—this paper provides a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between AI development and innovation performance.
Suggested Citation
Cheng, Huifang & Lin, Shengbin & Hong, Chenxiang, 2026.
"Quantity or efficiency? The impact of AI adoption on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies,"
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:soceps:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0038012126000364
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2026.102450
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:105:y:2026:i:c:s0038012126000364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.