IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v103y2026ics0038012125002393.html

Are European regions on the right track to achieve the 2030 strategic education and training targets? A comprehensive performance assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Durães, Maria João
  • Barbosa, Flávia
  • D’Inverno, Giovanna
  • Camanho, Ana S.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the comprehensive assessment of regional performance in attaining the 2030 Strategic Framework for Education and Training (ET2030) established by the European Union. To this end, we propose a composite indicator framework based on robust Benefit-of-the-doubt models empirically validated through an extensive analysis of data spanning 32 countries and 101 NUTS-I level regions for 2019. We integrate contextual variables into a robust conditional model to ensure an equitable evaluation among regions grappling with distinct circumstances. Specifically, the unemployment rate and the percentage of the population holding national citizenship are considered. Moreover, the research identifies best practices from high-performing regions that can serve as benchmarks for underperforming areas. Analyzing regional-level data is crucial for understanding disparities between European regions and within countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Durães, Maria João & Barbosa, Flávia & D’Inverno, Giovanna & Camanho, Ana S., 2026. "Are European regions on the right track to achieve the 2030 strategic education and training targets? A comprehensive performance assessment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125002393
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125002393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125002393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.