IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v103y2026ics0038012125002289.html

Which indicator best measures cultural engagement? A comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Gallo, Alessandro
  • Giambona, Francesca Adele
  • Vignoli, Daniele

Abstract

Culture plays a central role in society. It supports inclusion, identity, and civic participation, while also contributing to economic activity and political engagement. Therefore, using appropriate tools to measure Cultural Engagement (CE) is crucial. In this paper, a set of composite indicators to measure cultural participation is developed, starting from individual participation in a range of cultural activities. Traditional methods—such as weighted and unweighted averages and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)—and a different approach based on Item Response Theory (IRT) are compared. These methods are examined in terms of interpretability and key features, looking across Italian regions and population subgroups, with attention to economic resources, education and gender. The analysis relies on nine waves (2014–2022) of the Aspects of Daily Life survey by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). While classical methods tend to be more intuitive and easier to read, the IRT-based approach offers distinct advantages, especially when analyzing individual cultural activities. Overall, the IRT approach enriches a body of literature that has, so far, offered limited tools for measuring CE.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallo, Alessandro & Giambona, Francesca Adele & Vignoli, Daniele, 2026. "Which indicator best measures cultural engagement? A comparative analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125002289
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125002289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Watson & Stephen Law & Lars Osberg, 2022. "Are Populists Insecure About Themselves or About Their Country? Political Attitudes and Economic Perceptions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 667-705, January.
    2. F. Di Lascio & Simone Giannerini & Antonello Scorcu & Guido Candela, 2011. "Cultural tourism and temporary art exhibitions in Italy: a panel data analysis," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 20(4), pages 519-542, November.
    3. Michela Nardo & Michaela Saisana & Andrea Saltelli & Stefano Tarantola & Anders Hoffmann & Enrico Giovannini, 2005. "Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2005/3, OECD Publishing.
    4. Desirée Campagna & Giulio Caperna & Valentina Montalto, 2020. "Does Culture Make a Better Citizen? Exploring the Relationship Between Cultural and Civic Participation in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 657-686, June.
    5. Agovino, Massimiliano & Crociata, Alessandro & Quaglione, Davide & Sacco, Pierluigi & Sarra, Alessandro, 2017. "Good Taste Tastes Good. Cultural Capital as a Determinant of Organic Food Purchase by Italian Consumers: Evidence and Policy Implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 66-75.
    6. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    7. Tiziana Cuccia & Roberto Cellini, 2007. "Is cultural heritage really important for tourists? A contingent rating study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 261-271.
    8. Pascal Courty & Fenghua Zhang, 2018. "Cultural participation in major Chinese cities," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 543-592, November.
    9. Lorenzo Biferale & Maria Giovanna Brandano & Alessandro Crociata & Hygor P. M. Melo, 2024. "The spatial dimensions of cultural consumption: how distance influences consumption levels in a spatial setting," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 48(4), pages 499-525, December.
    10. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2009. "Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(3), pages 659-687, June.
    11. Elisa Panzera & Thomas de Graaff & Henri L.F. de Groot, 2021. "European cultural heritage and tourism flows: The magnetic role of superstar World Heritage Sites," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 101-122, February.
    12. Raffaele Guetto & Giacomo Bazzani & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Narratives of the future and fertility decision-making in uncertain times. An application to the COVID-19 pandemic," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 20(1), pages 223-260.
    13. Francesca Giambona & Mariano Porcu & Isabella Sulis, 2023. "Does education protect families' well-being in times of crisis? Measurement issues and empirical findings from IT-SILC data," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 299-328, March.
    14. Damiano Fiorillo & Ferdinando Ofria, 2024. "Cultural heritage participation in Italy: the role of human and social capital," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(9), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Ateca-Amestoy, Victoria & Prieto-Rodriguez, Juan, 2013. "Forecasting accuracy of behavioural models for participation in the arts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 124-131.
    16. Tan, Si Ying & Foo, Chuan De & Verma, Monica & Hanvoravongchai, Piya & Cheh, Paul Li Jen & Pholpark, Aungsumalee & Marthias, Tiara & Hafidz, Firdaus & Prawidya Putri, Likke & Mahendradhata, Yodi & Gia, 2023. "Mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    17. Koen Decancq & María Ana Lugo, 2013. "Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 7-34, January.
    18. Vollmer, Frank & Alkire, Sabina, 2022. "Consolidating and improving the assets indicator in the global Multidimensional Poverty Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Sara Suarez-Fernandez & Juan Prieto-Rodriguez & Maria Jose Perez-Villadoniga, 2020. "The changing role of education as we move from popular to highbrow culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 189-212, June.
    20. Andrea Saltelli, 2007. "Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 65-77, March.
    21. Jean-Paul Fox & Cees Glas, 2001. "Bayesian estimation of a multilevel IRT model using gibbs sampling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 271-288, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milica Maricic & Jose A. Egea & Veljko Jeremic, 2019. "A Hybrid Enhanced Scatter Search—Composite I-Distance Indicator (eSS-CIDI) Optimization Approach for Determining Weights Within Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 497-537, July.
    2. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2018. "σ-µ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices," MPRA Paper 83569, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Khatab Alqararah, 2023. "Assessing the robustness of composite indicators: the case of the Global Innovation Index," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Calogero Guccio & Domenico Lisi & Marco Martorana & Anna Mignosa, 2017. "On the role of cultural participation in tourism destination performance: an assessment using robust conditional efficiency approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 129-154, May.
    5. García-Pérez, Carmelo & Prieto-Alaiz, Mercedes & Simón, Hipólito, 2020. "Multidimensional measurement of precarious employment using hedonic weights: Evidence from Spain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 348-359.
    6. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    7. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2019. "Sigma-Mu efficiency analysis: A methodology for evaluating units through composite indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 942-960.
    8. Panagiotis Artelaris, 2022. "A development index for the Greek regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1261-1281, June.
    9. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2024. "On the Coherence of Composite Indexes: Multiversal Model and Specification Analysis for an Index of Well-Being," MetaArXiv d5y26, Center for Open Science.
    10. Matheus Pereira Libório & Alexandre Magno Alvez Diniz & Douglas Alexandre Gomes Vieira & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel, 2024. "Subjective–Objective Method of Maximizing the Average Variance Extracted From Sub-indicators in Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 613-637, November.
    11. Cohen Kaminitz, Shiri, 2024. "The Strong 'Dual-Necessity’ principle for ranking social progress," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    12. Jad Chaaban & Alexandra Irani & Alexander Khoury, 2016. "The Composite Global Well-Being Index (CGWBI): A New Multi-Dimensional Measure of Human Development," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 465-487, October.
    13. Walheer, Barnabé, 2024. "A sequential benefit-of-the-doubt composite indicator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 228-239.
    14. repec:osf:metaar:d5y26_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Giovanna Boccuzzo & Licia Maron, 2017. "Proposal of a composite indicator of job quality based on a measure of weighted distances," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2357-2374, September.
    16. Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano & Francesco M. Chelli & Mauro Gallegati, 2022. "It is the Total that Does [Not] Make the Sum: Nature, Economy and Society in the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being of the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 491-522, June.
    17. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Samy Katumba & Julia Kadt & Mark Orkin & Paul Fatti, 2022. "Construction of a Reflective Quality of Life Index for Gauteng Province in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 373-408, November.
    20. Renata Pelissari & Sarah Ben Amor & Álvaro Oliveira D’Antona & Eduardo José Marandola Júnior & Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte, 2024. "A semi-supervised multi-criteria sorting approach to constructing social vulnerability composite indicators," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(1), pages 235-260, June.
    21. Wende Wang & Mozhuang Fu & Qingwu Hu, 2020. "The Behavioral Pattern of Chinese Public Cultural Participation in Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125002289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.