Author
Listed:
- Hornberger, Zachary T.
- King, Douglas M.
- Jacobson, Sheldon H.
Abstract
Mass killings (e.g., 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting, 2017 Las Vegas shooting) are tragedies that devastate the victims’ families and harm the local communities and the nation at large. Amid an increase in mass-killing research, the idea that these events may be contagious has emerged among scholars and been publicized in popular media. This paper implements a three-phase methodology to evaluate the social contagion hypothesis for US mass killings that (a) detects prominent contagion effects, (b) identifies mass killing clusters, and (c) detects subtle contagion effects. Evidence of a prominent contagion effect was not found, utilizing a periodically-observed time-homogeneous Poisson process framework. It is shown that the occurrence of family mass killings and the occurrence of felony mass killings were homogeneous and temporally random between 2006 and 2023, whereas the rate of public mass killings during this timeframe approximately doubled starting in late 2015. The occurrence of public mass killings was homogeneous and temporally random when separated at this arrival rate changepoint. Event clusters were identified and compared to Poisson bursts with respect to three attributes: number of clusters, duration, and surprise. The relationship between event notoriety and the time until the subsequent event was also evaluated. Analysis of the relationship between event notoriety and the time until the next mass killing revealed some irregularities that, while not consistent with a subtle contagion effect, invite future qualitative research investigating specific clusters for evidence of behavioral transmission. The ten highest-density clusters for each mass killing type are reported to facilitate future research.
Suggested Citation
Hornberger, Zachary T. & King, Douglas M. & Jacobson, Sheldon H., 2026.
"Temporal analysis of the clustering and hypothesized social contagion of mass killing events in the United States,"
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125001983
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102349
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s0038012125001983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.