IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v100y2025ics0038012125000655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bank branch desertification and the design of a postal banking network

Author

Listed:
  • Baldassarre, Silvia
  • Cavola, Manuel
  • Pipicelli, Eduardo

Abstract

The desertification of bank branches, driven by digital transformation, has exacerbated financial exclusion among individuals less keen to adopt digital channels or those living in lower-income and less densely populated regions. In this scenario, postal operators have emerged as main competitors in providing physical and face-to-face financial services in areas without a banking presence, leveraging their capillary network of post offices. In this work, we propose a mathematical model to support postal providers in decision-making concerning the network design for consulting services. The model aims to maximize the attracted demand of customers who are financially excluded due to branch closures, by identifying the best locations among post offices where to activate consulting services and planning the availability in terms of time windows. The model has been applied to the rural areas of the Campania region in southern Italy, where bank branch closures have significantly impacted customers’ access to banking services. The results demonstrate that the model can effectively support the consulting network design process, offering an effective framework for making appropriate decisions based on preferred provision policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Baldassarre, Silvia & Cavola, Manuel & Pipicelli, Eduardo, 2025. "Bank branch desertification and the design of a postal banking network," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2025.102216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012125000655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0038012125000655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.