IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v81y2019icp84-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intention-based fairness preferences in multi-partner project teams

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Jiaojie
  • Rapoport, Amnon

Abstract

We propose a stylized model of cooperative effort expenditure in multi-agent teams which is driven by intention-based preferences for fairness. Differing from preferences about material payoffs, we consider agents with intention-based preferences for fairness who also care about the motivation that drives other agents’ actions. In the spirit of Rabin (1993), we define the agent's kindness to other agents in terms of how much more or less than other agents’ equitable payoff that agent believes she is giving to the other agent. In a series of propositions, we compare to each other two kinds of agents: “selfish” agents who are only motivated to maximize their material payoffs, and “unselfish” agents who are also motivated by considerations of intention-based fairness to their co-workers. Our analysis shows that the effect of intention-based fairness preferences on the agents’ cooperative effort expenditure depends critically on the effort cost of the agents and on major attributes of the project. Additionally, the intention-based fairness preference may change the way that the project attributes influence the agents’ cooperative effort choices. We conclude the paper by proposing recommendations for enhancing cooperation of the agents in project teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Jiaojie & Rapoport, Amnon, 2019. "Intention-based fairness preferences in multi-partner project teams," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 84-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:84-90
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2019.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804318302210
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2019.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:84-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.